For his
article titled “Searching for Immigration Reform” published in The Virginian Pilot, Ray Tranchant
should be given a medal. In one rather curt piece, this sharp-eyed reporter was
able to communicate more real
facts and solutions to the immigration problem than any presidential candidate has
been able to in the past few months. Many Americans did not understand the
immigration problem in its entirety, being led by their favorite candidate to
see it in their way and ignore the complexity of the problem. The candidates
themselves clearly are no better, since as Tranchant puts it, “it’s either all or nothing”. By calling politicians
out on their perpetual use of an either/or logical fallacy, Tranchant is able
to make the very logical argument that
America lawmakers, and the American people, should stop searching for extreme
black and white answers and try to look for a middle road. His argument refreshingly
analyses and accounts for both sides of the immigration controversy; seeing the
benefits in having open borders as well as a necessity for more strictly closed
borders. After looking at both sides, Tranchant provides specific examples to
support his analysis of the situation. He says, “Both Clinton and Sanders want
amnesty for whomever lands in the United States. Their push is to bring broken
families back together, but they both fail to mention how they got separated in
the first place. Does the father or mother get deported because of a felony, or
does the U.S. government just randomly deport immigrants without considering
family circumstances? Donald Trump and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz want the complete
deportation of 12 million to 30 million people. That’s a little much, isn’t it?”
, to point out the flaws in both sides. Not only is Tranchant right about the
foolishness of the aforementioned candidates, but he can prove exactly why they
are wrong. By being straightforward and honest, looking at both sides without discernable
bias, and using very blunt, to-the-point language, Tranchant is able to very effectively
argue a logical argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment